Skip to main content

What are the biggest misconceptions people have about economics

They Think They Understand It
It’s a Friday night. You head down to your corner bar to grab a drink and unwind from a long week. Just as the liquid slips down your throat you over hear the conversation of the people next to you. What’re they talking about? Oh but politics and the economy of course! Everyone and their mother knows what’s wrong with it and how to fix it.
I can’t tell you how many times I run into people that speak with such confidence on matters of micro and macro economics without having the slightest clue what they’re talking about. Rambling on about this and that and how if they did it their way we’d all live in an utopian paradise. They’ve formed a solid opinion about a sliver of an economic problem and suddenly they’ve become a professor on the matter.
The stone cold truth is that most people don’t know what they’re talking about, even outside of just economics. It’s not politically correct to say so, but I’m not going to twist the truth cause it’s sour. From foreign policy, international affairs, economics, etc, a majority of people just don’t know what they’re talking about. Sometimes even financial professionals and academics, the people who get paid to ponder on economic theory & process, don’t understand it in it’s entirety. If they did we’d be able to prevent horrible economic downturns before they ravaged whole nations of their wealth. Economics, much like politics is an ever changing and fluid environment where what may have been true yesterday may not necessarily be true tomorrow.
In an interview with Men’s Journal, Tony Robbins, mentioned that when he interviewed Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and asked him what he’d do if he were still chairman of the reserve, Greenspan replied he’d resign. If we put aside the belief some hold that Greenspan engineered the financial collapse of 2008, you have an accomplished economist who’s admitting to not having a clue how to remedy a situation and so would quit the job. Seems to be a pretty bleak and complex situation if such an experienced man is throwing his hat down. If this man isn’t sure what to do with his years of education & experience as an economist, then I’m not sure how any of us who have no frame of reference whatsoever, have the right to a fierce opinion.
Economics is hard, really hard. It’s hard to understand it for one nation. We live today in a global economy where goods, services and products flow freely between nations. Understanding the myriad of complex relationships, causalities, etc is extremely challenging even for the finest minds. Most people don’t have a clue what they’re talking about.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What if the two largest apex predators of all time, fought each other

First of all: So, what were/are the two largest apex predators in history? Well, baleen and sperm whales are predators but their status as apex predators are questionable at best, ruling them out. Many people think that a T-Rex, some sort of dinosaur, or other carnivorous land creature would be the largest apex predator. However, this is not true. Many of the largest apex predators in history have lived in the ocean because of the vast space to grow and since the water can support their larger weight. As of now, the two largest apex predators in history were  Carcharocles Megalodon , a giant whale-eating shark and  Livyatan Melvillei , a giant whale-eating raptorial whale both now extinct. Both of these animals were from similar time periods, and coexisted for a few million years. Livyatan appeared and went extinct during Megalodon’s rule. But how would these two fare in a battle against each other? Megalodon vs Livyatan: Carcharocles Megalodon- Size Estimates:-...
Post a Comment
Read more

Can the Philippines become a developed country

keep growing its economy. get the Islamist insurgency under control and defeated. solve its traffic problem. The last is the hardest. I’ve the long term solution. First, why doesn’t Grab work everywhere? Remove the regulatory barriers. Second, while ride sharing helps, for a country of the density of the Philippines, mass transit rail is the only solution. However bringing mass transit rail directly to the cores of the cities like Manila is not practical. Instead, for now, take advantage of the growing population, and introduce mass transit rail with every development in the suburbs. Eventually there will be concentric rings of rail around each city, which will reduce the surface traffic in the cores because if it takes 50 times longer to move along the radius as as circumference, people will choose the circumference even if the distance is 6.28 times longer (circumference = 2 * radius * pi). Eventually people will abandon the cores, and this will be an opportunity for ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is overpopulation a myth

In Bangladesh,  NO . 1,500 people per km². In Russia,  YES . 8.4 people per km². The little red zone, which features Bangladesh, holds more people than the blue zone, which features Russia, in the following map. Not a myth for everyone. EDIT: For some strange reason some of the commenters think that this answer is advocating that the western countries should take in our extra population. Sorry to break the bad news, this is not advocating any such thing. For some even more bizarre reason some commenters are upset that I have compared overcrowded lands with unihabited lands (to the point of calling me “dishonest”). I don’t even know what to say to that. May be they just needed something to be upset about.
Post a Comment
Read more