Skip to main content

Policing – is policing a public good

The general protection that the police services provide in deterring crime and investigating criminal acts serves as a public good. But resources used up in providing policing means that fewer resources are available elsewhere. Private protection services such as private security guards, privately bought security systems and detectives are private goods because the service is excludable and rival in consumption and people and businesses are often prepared to pay a high price.
Why are public goods an example of market failure?
  • Pure public goods are not normally provided by the private sector because they would be unable to supply them for a profit.
  • It is up to the government to decide what output of public goods is appropriate for society.
  • To do this, it must estimate the social benefits from making public goods available.
What is meant by the Free Rider Problem?
  • Because public goods are non-excludable it is difficult to charge people for benefitting form a good or service once it is provided
  • The free rider problem leads to under-provision of a good and thus causes market failure
What are Quasi-Public Goods?
A quasi-public good is a near-public good i.e. it has many but not all the characteristics of a public good. Quasi public goods are:
  1. Semi-non-rival: up to a point, extra consumers using a park, beach or road do not reduce the space available for others. Eventually beaches become crowded as do parks and other leisure facilities. Open access Wi-Fi networks become crowded
  2. Semi-non-excludable: it is possible but often difficult or expensive to exclude non-paying consumers. E.g. fencing a park or beach and charging an entrance fee; building toll booths to charge for road usage on congested routes
The air waves – a public good or quasi public good?
  • The airwaves used by mobile phone companies, radio stations and television companies are owned by the government.
  • Do they count as a pure public good? One person's use of the airwaves rarely limits how other people can benefit from utilising them.
  • At peak times, the airwaves become crowded
  • The government also controls the issue of licences needed to operate mobile phone services using the airwaves in the UK. In 2000, they auctioned off five licences for 3rd generation mobile phone services and raised £22 billion in doing so. In 2013, the government auctioned off super-fast 4G mobile phone spectrums
  • The case for government intervention with public goods
    Overcoming the Free-Rider
    Direct provision of a public good by the government can help to overcome the free-rider problem which leads to market failure
    • The non-rival nature of consumption provides a strong case for the government rather than the market to provide and pay for public goods.
    • Many public goods are provided more or less free at the point of use and then paid for out of general taxation or another general form of charge such as a licence fee.
    • State provision may help to prevent the under-provision and under-consumption of public goods so that social welfare is improved.
    • If the government provides public goods they may be able to do so more efficiently because of economies of scale.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Which countries are likely to be developed countries soon?

A lot of the answers have stated some of the Eastern European countries and I agree with them however another region that is soon going to have developed countries soon is Asia and Asia has some good candidates: The GDP Per Capita (PPP) benchmark to be counted as developed is in the $20–25,000 range and that is the bare minimum also the country’s HDI has to be higher than 0.800 with a diversified industrial composition. A total of 17 countries fit the bill however a closer look at their HDI or industrial composition would make it clear why they are not considered developed, a lot of them would be considered developed if they could fix these issues, most of this can be achieved within 10 years time, I will start by assessing each country on its major issue and how long it will take based on that: Qatar:  Over reliance on one industry,  time needed:  5 years Singapore:  Already developed Brunei:  Over reliance on one industry,  time needed: ...

Can the Philippines become a developed country

keep growing its economy. get the Islamist insurgency under control and defeated. solve its traffic problem. The last is the hardest. I’ve the long term solution. First, why doesn’t Grab work everywhere? Remove the regulatory barriers. Second, while ride sharing helps, for a country of the density of the Philippines, mass transit rail is the only solution. However bringing mass transit rail directly to the cores of the cities like Manila is not practical. Instead, for now, take advantage of the growing population, and introduce mass transit rail with every development in the suburbs. Eventually there will be concentric rings of rail around each city, which will reduce the surface traffic in the cores because if it takes 50 times longer to move along the radius as as circumference, people will choose the circumference even if the distance is 6.28 times longer (circumference = 2 * radius * pi). Eventually people will abandon the cores, and this will be an opportunity for ...

What does spending $20bn on the world's longest bridge say about the strength of China's economy

Some people ask questions about China and the Chinese, which shows a complete ignorance of the Questioner. The best question/s come from people who understand China/the Chinese length and breadth of the culture. For example, this man at the best could be 140 lbs and carrying this load to deliver to a restaurant in the Yellow Mountains. The Chinese Government easily could deliver it through Helicopters, but they do not want to kill the livelihood of hundreds of such porter. To the Western World, it may not make sense, but the Eastern Culture makes sense. On the other hand, this mountain man who is fit as the fiddle, loves his livelihood, his mountainous surrounding. He does not give two hoots to bright lights of Shanghai, he does not want to move(I am guessing), and the Government of China recognizes it, and that is why most to the Chinese do not give two hoots for useless democracy and fake freedom. And President Xi and his wife the first lady are the darlings of the masses. Th...