Skip to main content

If the U.S. is richer than Saudi Arabia, how come Saudis live more lavishly than Americans

You mean like these wealthy folks, living in lavish comfort?
Most nations have rich people and poor people. Saudi Arabia's economy is what's known as an extractive economy, where most of the nation’s prosperity depends on extracting a natural resource (oil, in this case) and selling it to other places. Now, extractive economies tend to be the worst for wealth inequality. The bulk of the nation's income flows to those who control the natural resources. In Saudi Arabia, that's a relatively small number of very large families. They become very, very rich. The rest of the nation fares much more poorly. Extractive economies do create jobs, local people work in drilling and refining operations, and having that much money flowing around creates at least some jobs, but the prosperity is wildly uneven. As a result, a fifth of the population lives below the poverty line, while the richest have insane wealth.
The short version is that the average Saudi Arabian does not live more lavishly than the average American. The super-wealthy do, because they control an insanely outsized portion of the nation's wealth. And since internet slideshows and tourism brochures like showing garages full of Bentleys and gold-plated toilets more than they like showing slums and poor villages, we get the impression that Saudis are all rich, when they very certainly are not.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can the Philippines become a developed country

keep growing its economy. get the Islamist insurgency under control and defeated. solve its traffic problem. The last is the hardest. I’ve the long term solution. First, why doesn’t Grab work everywhere? Remove the regulatory barriers. Second, while ride sharing helps, for a country of the density of the Philippines, mass transit rail is the only solution. However bringing mass transit rail directly to the cores of the cities like Manila is not practical. Instead, for now, take advantage of the growing population, and introduce mass transit rail with every development in the suburbs. Eventually there will be concentric rings of rail around each city, which will reduce the surface traffic in the cores because if it takes 50 times longer to move along the radius as as circumference, people will choose the circumference even if the distance is 6.28 times longer (circumference = 2 * radius * pi). Eventually people will abandon the cores, and this will be an opportunity for ...

What does spending $20bn on the world's longest bridge say about the strength of China's economy

Some people ask questions about China and the Chinese, which shows a complete ignorance of the Questioner. The best question/s come from people who understand China/the Chinese length and breadth of the culture. For example, this man at the best could be 140 lbs and carrying this load to deliver to a restaurant in the Yellow Mountains. The Chinese Government easily could deliver it through Helicopters, but they do not want to kill the livelihood of hundreds of such porter. To the Western World, it may not make sense, but the Eastern Culture makes sense. On the other hand, this mountain man who is fit as the fiddle, loves his livelihood, his mountainous surrounding. He does not give two hoots to bright lights of Shanghai, he does not want to move(I am guessing), and the Government of China recognizes it, and that is why most to the Chinese do not give two hoots for useless democracy and fake freedom. And President Xi and his wife the first lady are the darlings of the masses. Th...

Which countries are likely to be developed countries soon?

A lot of the answers have stated some of the Eastern European countries and I agree with them however another region that is soon going to have developed countries soon is Asia and Asia has some good candidates: The GDP Per Capita (PPP) benchmark to be counted as developed is in the $20–25,000 range and that is the bare minimum also the country’s HDI has to be higher than 0.800 with a diversified industrial composition. A total of 17 countries fit the bill however a closer look at their HDI or industrial composition would make it clear why they are not considered developed, a lot of them would be considered developed if they could fix these issues, most of this can be achieved within 10 years time, I will start by assessing each country on its major issue and how long it will take based on that: Qatar:  Over reliance on one industry,  time needed:  5 years Singapore:  Already developed Brunei:  Over reliance on one industry,  time needed: ...