Skip to main content

What is the purpose of mosquitoes and what would happen if mosquitoes went extinct? Would any ecosystems or the food chain be drastically affected if mosquitoes became extinct suddenly

Mosquitoes are one of the most annoying creatures in the world. Like me, you may have wondered what good they are to the world and what would happen if they all just suddenly disappeared?
Mosquitoes are the deadliest animal in the world. They certainly aren’t the scariest, but they have killed more people than any other animal by a long shot. This is mostly because they pass along diseases such as malaria and zika from person to person, causing the person they bit to contract that disease. Because of that, many diseases would likely dissipate and fade away, eventually dying out. This would save many lives, as countless people have died from mosquito-spread viruses, like malaria. Overall, the extinction of mosquitoes would save countless future lives
If mosquitoes disappeared, this would also affect the environment, and more directly, the food chain. Mosquitoes are part of a lot of food chains, with them being food for many birds, insects and other wildlife. For example, mosquitoes make up almost 3% of a purple martin, the largest North American swallow. This would be a smaller effect of the extinction, and the main effect would be that many people’s lives would be saved in the future due to the diseases that mosquitoes carried fading away. While those diseases wouldn’t completely die out, they would be contracted by far less people without mosquitoes to carry them around.
Like me, a bunch of you guys probably wish all the time, especially in the summer when those annoying pests won’t leave you alone, that mosquitoes would all just disappear. If they did, that would save countless lives, and also slightly affect the ecosystem.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What if the two largest apex predators of all time, fought each other

First of all: So, what were/are the two largest apex predators in history? Well, baleen and sperm whales are predators but their status as apex predators are questionable at best, ruling them out. Many people think that a T-Rex, some sort of dinosaur, or other carnivorous land creature would be the largest apex predator. However, this is not true. Many of the largest apex predators in history have lived in the ocean because of the vast space to grow and since the water can support their larger weight. As of now, the two largest apex predators in history were  Carcharocles Megalodon , a giant whale-eating shark and  Livyatan Melvillei , a giant whale-eating raptorial whale both now extinct. Both of these animals were from similar time periods, and coexisted for a few million years. Livyatan appeared and went extinct during Megalodon’s rule. But how would these two fare in a battle against each other? Megalodon vs Livyatan: Carcharocles Megalodon- Size Estimates:-...

Can the Philippines become a developed country

keep growing its economy. get the Islamist insurgency under control and defeated. solve its traffic problem. The last is the hardest. I’ve the long term solution. First, why doesn’t Grab work everywhere? Remove the regulatory barriers. Second, while ride sharing helps, for a country of the density of the Philippines, mass transit rail is the only solution. However bringing mass transit rail directly to the cores of the cities like Manila is not practical. Instead, for now, take advantage of the growing population, and introduce mass transit rail with every development in the suburbs. Eventually there will be concentric rings of rail around each city, which will reduce the surface traffic in the cores because if it takes 50 times longer to move along the radius as as circumference, people will choose the circumference even if the distance is 6.28 times longer (circumference = 2 * radius * pi). Eventually people will abandon the cores, and this will be an opportunity for ...

Is overpopulation a myth

In Bangladesh,  NO . 1,500 people per km². In Russia,  YES . 8.4 people per km². The little red zone, which features Bangladesh, holds more people than the blue zone, which features Russia, in the following map. Not a myth for everyone. EDIT: For some strange reason some of the commenters think that this answer is advocating that the western countries should take in our extra population. Sorry to break the bad news, this is not advocating any such thing. For some even more bizarre reason some commenters are upset that I have compared overcrowded lands with unihabited lands (to the point of calling me “dishonest”). I don’t even know what to say to that. May be they just needed something to be upset about.